The genesic
tendencies are thus, to a certain degree, independent of the generative glands,
although the development of these glands serves to increase the genesic ability
and to furnish the impulsion necessary to assure procreation, as well as to
insure the development of the secondary sexual characters, probably by the
influence of secretions elaborated and thrown into the system from the primary
sexual glands.[7]
Halban
("Die Entstehung der Geschlechtscharaktere," Archiv für Gynäkologie, 1903,
pp. 205-308) argues that the primary sex glands do not necessarily produce the
secondary sex characters, nor inhibit the development of those characteristic
of the opposite sex. It is indeed the rule, but it is not the inevitable result.
Sexual differences exist from the first. Nussbaum made experiments on frogs (Rana
fusca), which go through a yearly cycle of secondary sexual changes at the
period of heat. These changes cease on castration, but, if the testes of other
frogs are introduced beneath the skin of the castrated frogs, Nussbaum found
that they acted as if the frog had not been castrated. It is the secretion of
the testes which produces the secondary sexual changes. But Nussbaum found that
the testicular secretion does not work if the nerves of the secondary sexual
region are cut, and that the secretion has no direct action on the organism. Pflüger,
discussing these experiments (Archiv für die Gesammte Physiologie, 1907, vol. cxvi,
parts 5 and 6), disputes this conclusion, and argues that the secretion is not
dependent on the action of the nervous system, and that therefore the secondary
sexual characters are independent of the nervous system.
Steinach
has also in later experiments ("Geschlechtstrieb und echt Sekundäre
Geschlechtsmerkmale als Folge der innerskretorischen Funktion der Keimdrusen,"
Zentralblatt für Physiologie, Bd. xxiv, Nu. 13, 1910) argued against any local
nervous influence. He found in Rana fusca and esculenta that after castration
in autumn the impulse to grasp the female persisted in some degrees and then
disappeared, reappearing in a slight degree, however, every winter at the
normal period of sexual activity. But when the testicular substance of actively
sexual frogs was injected into the castrated frogs it exerted an elective
action on the sexual reflex, sometimes in a few hours, but the action is,
Steinach concludes, first central. The testicular secretion of frogs that were
not sexually active had no stimulating action, but if the frogs were sexually
active the injection of their central nervous substance was as effective as
their testicular substance. In either case, Steinach concludes, there is the
removal of an inhibition which is in operation at sexually quiescent periods.
Speaking
generally, Steinach considers that there is a process of "erotisation"
(Erotisieurung) of the nervous center under the influence of the internal
testicular secretions, and that this persists even when the primary physical
stimulus has been removed.
The
experience of veterinary surgeons also shows that the sexual impulse tends to
persist in animals after castration. Thus the ox and the gelding make frequent
efforts to copulate with females in heat. In some cases, at all events in the
case of the horse, castrated animals remain potent, and are even abnormally
ardent, although impregnation cannot, of course, result.[8]
The
results obtained by scientific experiment and veterinary experience on the
lower animals are confirmed by observation of various groups of phenomena in
the human species. There can be no doubt that castrated men may still possess
sexual impulses. This has been noted by observers in various countries in which
eunuchs are made and employed.[9]
It
is important to remember that there are different degrees of castration, for in
current language these are seldom distinguished. The Romans recognized four
different degrees: 1. True castrati, from whom both the testicles and the penis
had been removed. 2. Spadones, from whom the testicles only had been removed;
this was the most common practice. 3. Thlibiæ, in whom the testicles had not
been removed, but destroyed by crushing; this practice is referred to by
Hippocrates. 4. Thlasiæ, in whom the spermatic cord had simply been cut. Millant,
from whose Paris thesis (Castration Criminelle et Maniaque, 1902) I take these
definitions, points out that it was recognized that spadones remained apt for
coitus if the operation was performed after puberty, a fact appreciated by many
Roman ladies, ad seouras libidinationes, as St. Jerome remarked, while Martial (lib.
iv) said of a Roman lady who sought eunuchs: "Vult futui Gallia, non
parere." (See also Millant, Les Eunuques à Travers les Ages, 1909, and
articles by Lipa Bey and Zambaco, Sexual-Probleme, Oct. and Dec., 1911.)
No comments:
Post a Comment